World football governing body FIFA is planning to alter 2026 World Cup format with cues from the ongoing 2022 World Cup.
Thousands of fans have been enthused and enthralled by classic football, near perfect, top-notch, and sometimes a bit controversial officiating, but FIFA are reportedly keen on making alterations to the World Cup in the 2026 edition.
Recall that the body, under the leadership of Gianni Infantino, has reiterated its resolve to expand the reach of the World Cup by introducing a 48-team World Cup from 2026.
They plan was to divide the 48 teams into 16 groups, consisting of three teams each with two teams expected to qualify from the group to the next stage of the completion.
In a sharp change in priorities and fears, FIFA is now reportedly set to reverse its planned format for the 48-team World Cup.
As things stand now for 2026, when Canada, Mexico and the U.S. jointly host the World Cup, there is a risk of many ‘dead’ matches – for example if the last group game was between two teams who had already won one each and were therefore already qualified – or contrived results.
FIFA conceded earlier this year they were concerned about the possibility of contrived results where two teams could engineer a positive result for both, that would eliminate the third group team not playing. ‘It’s an issue that has been raised,’ said FIFA vice president Victor Montagliani in March.
The 2026 format has the 48 teams reduced to 32 after the group phase and then the tournament becomes a knockout affair.
Alternative formats are now on the table, with the FIFA Council, the organisation’s all-powerful cabinet, to decide next year.
They are, according to FIFA’s head of global football development Arsene Wenger, 12 groups of four teams, with the best third-placed teams advancing with the top two, or another option to split the World Cup into two separate halves of 24, each featuring six groups of four teams. The winner of each half would meet in the final.
Given how dramatic and exciting some of the four-team groups were concluded in Qatar, that seems a more viable proposition.
But that will mean a substantive increase in the number of games. The 32-team World Cup in Qatar has a total of 64 games, completed in 29 days, and, for now, the 2026 finals will be 80 games played in over 32 days.
With four team groups, there would be 104 matches, requiring at least an extra week.
There, FIFA run the risk of tilting the delicate balance of all-consuming excitement that the World Cup has proven in Qatar into a drawn out affair that loses its lustre with the quality of entertainment diluted.
More matches, however, would mean more television rights money and as the World Cup brings in some 90 per cent of FIFA’s revenue, its leaders will be tempted.
The World Cup in Qatar has earned £6.1billion in rights and sponsorship revenue, one billion more than for 2018 finals in Russia, FIFA said last month.